A clear structure in AiSTROLOGY horoscopes
A clear structure:
Michael Roscher's planetary model
Where should our horoscope interpretation begin? Why not with the sun sign that everybody knows? Because it would be rubbish! It may have some value, but it doesn't say much about a person individually who was born roughly in the same month like millions of others worldwide. That's why some people desperately talk about 'typical' Geminis and 'untypical' Capricorns...
The sign of only one astrological 'planet' has some individual meaning: The sign of the moon (which actually isn't even a planet) is the first text of our interpretation. The moon changes its sign every two and a half days. This makes the moon sign much more individual than the sun sign. We see the moon sign as a pair of glasses you are looking through, mostly without being aware of it.
The rest of the planetary structure of AiSTROLOGY is explained in this little story:
How we proceed.pdf
What's special about an AiSTROLOGY interpretation?
Print